Choose a Feed-Line for a 2 m Station
75 ft of cable at 146 MHz and 50 W: RG-58 delivers 18 W, RG-8X 22 W, RG-213 32 W and LMR-400 38 W. Why the cable matters more than the SWR on VHF.
On HF, almost any reasonable coax works for a short run. On VHF and UHF, cable loss rises steeply, and the feed-line can throw away more than half the transmitter power and the same share of every received signal. This guide compares four common cables for a typical home 2 m station: a vertical on the roof, 75 ft of cable to the shack, a 50 W transceiver, and an SWR of 1.5:1 at the antenna.
The comparison
The coax loss calculator gives the matched loss for 75 ft at 146 MHz and the total including the 1.5:1 SWR. RG-58 loses 4.20 dB matched and 4.35 dB in total, so of 50 W only 18.4 W reaches the antenna. RG-8X loses 3.38 dB matched and 3.52 dB in total, delivering 22.3 W. RG-213 loses 1.80 dB matched and 1.90 dB in total, delivering 32.3 W. LMR-400 loses 1.13 dB matched and 1.20 dB in total, delivering 38.0 W. The difference between the cheapest and the best cable is more than a factor of two, about 3.2 dB: half an S unit at the other station.
The SWR is the smaller problem
Notice how little the 1.5:1 SWR adds: 0.07 to 0.15 dB depending on the cable. Spending an afternoon improving the antenna match from 1.5:1 to 1.1:1 would gain less than a tenth of a decibel, while changing from RG-58 to LMR-400 gains over 3 dB. On VHF, the cable is the first place to look, then connectors, then the match. A common misconception is that a low SWR reading at the radio means the system is efficient; with 4 dB of cable loss, a 1.5:1 SWR at the antenna reads about 1.2:1 at the radio, which looks excellent and is not.
Receive matters as much as transmit
Cable loss works in both directions. A signal arriving at the antenna at −110 dBm reaches the receiver at −114.2 dBm through the RG-58 and at −111.1 dBm through the LMR-400. For weak-signal work near the noise floor, those 3 dB can decide whether a contact is possible at all. A preamplifier at the antenna end recovers some of the receive loss on a long run, but it does nothing for transmit, and good cable is simpler and more reliable.
Practical trade-offs
LMR-400 is thicker, stiffer and more expensive than RG-8X, and needs proper connectors; RG-213 is heavier still. For a 10 ft jumper to a mobile antenna, RG-58 loses only about 0.6 dB on 2 m and its flexibility is worth more than the loss. For a 75 ft run to a roof, the low-loss cable pays for itself on the first weak contact. At 440 MHz on the 70 cm band, the differences grow: 75 ft of RG-58 loses 7.5 dB, more than four-fifths of the power, while LMR-400 loses 2.0 dB. Seal outdoor connectors against water; wet cable can double its loss.
Common mistakes
- Using HF habits on VHF. Cable that is fine on 20 m can lose half the power on 2 m.
- Trusting the shack SWR. Cable loss masks the mismatch at the antenna.
- Ignoring connectors. A poorly fitted PL-259 or an adapter chain adds loss and intermittent faults.
- Forgetting receive. Every decibel lost on transmit is also lost on every received signal.
- Letting water in. Seal outdoor joints and replace cable that has been wet.
Feed-line checklist
- Measure the cable run from the radio to the antenna, including any slack.
- Compare cables at your highest operating frequency, not the lowest.
- Check the total loss with your expected SWR and the power reaching the antenna.
- Choose the thinnest cable whose loss you can accept for that run.
- Fit connectors properly and weatherproof every outdoor joint.